Are You Spying on Your Competitors' Push Ad Campaigns?

Our spy tools monitor millions of push notification ads from over 90+ countries and thousands of publishers.

Get Started

If you're running push traffic to your eCommerce or affiliate offers, it would be best to look into what your competitors are doing. If they are seeing success, then logic dictates you follow that direction.

There are only a handful of push spy tools in the market, and two well-known ones are Spypush and Anstrex. Which one can help you push your marketing campaigns in the green? Let's have a look.

Feature Comparison: Anstrex vs Spypush

To properly determine which tool is better, let us compare all applicable features side by side and see which platform is one step ahead.


1. Amount of Ads Tracked

This is one of the most important features an advertiser should look into. The more ads tracked and added within a platform’s inventory, the higher the chances that you’ll find the ads that you are looking for.

More is always better.

Anstrex Push has collected more than three million push ads in its database, while Spypush has collected around two million push ads. In this aspect, Anstrex is clearly the better choice.


2. Geo Coverage

Having a wide reach is another important factor with a spy tool. If you’re planning on running ads in different countries, then you need to be able to spy on localized ads.

If you choose Anstrex, you will have access to ads that span 95 countries. If you go with Spypush, you will be able to find ads that span 140 countries. This means Spypush provides wider coverage.


3. Ad Networks Monitored

Aside from geo coverage, your spy tool should be able to gain access to ads that run in various ad networks. There are several push ad providers as of today, each one sending exclusive traffic to advertisers.

If you want to gather accurate data on your rivals’ push notifications activities, you need to be able to find the ads that they send to customers through multiple ad channels.

Anstrex collects ads from 38 ad networks, while Spypush collects ads from 10 ad networks. Clearly, Anstrex is one step ahead when it comes to ad network reach.


4. Download Landing Page

You’ve seen the ads. You’ve copied the featured image and text descriptions. What’s the next step to ensure that you succeed as much as your competitor did? Copy the landing page of course!

Doing it manually can be a pain. Thankfully, both of these spy tools allow you to download the landing page in one click.

However, Anstrex went a step further by providing advertisers a way to edit landing pages. This is a powerful tool is a WYSIWYG editor, which allows even the most novice of users to make changes on the landing page, especially the affiliate link.

This is why in this respect, Anstrex is the clear winner.



5. Immediate Landing Page Launch

Since we’re on the topic of ripping and editing landing pages, let’s talk about what happens next to your downloaded webpages.

After downloading, you will open your web hosting account, navigate to the right website, folder, or bucket, and upload the files. That is of course assuming you have already edited the page to reflect your own offer link in the CTAs and relevant locations. After that, your landing page is ready to receive traffic.

But what if you can skip all that? What if you can send the landing page directly to your web host after you have cleaned it and added your own links? This is entirely possible with Anstrex.

Anstrex allows you to link your AWS account or your FTP account to its platform. This way, once you find the landing page you want, you can edit it through their in-house WYSIWYG editor, and then immediately launch it!

Unfortunately, Spypush does not have the same feature, so Anstrex wins this one.


6. Favorite Ads

Let’s say you’ve finally found the ads that you want to use, and you still want to keep on searching for more. There must be a way to mark the ads for future reference, yes?

Both Anstrex and Spypush have the heart button which marks the ad as a “Favorite”. This effectively places the creative into your Favorite folder, which you can easily access at any time. As such, both tools are on equal footing with this feature.


7. Search and Filters

You can find your competitors’ ads more easily if you can narrow down the search results. Again, both spy tools have the search and filtering option, but their capabilities are different.

Spypush allows you to search via keywords and URLs. You can also narrow it down via the following filters:

  • Country
  • Language
  • Device type
  • Network
  • Date
  • Activity (whether currently active or inactive)

Anstrex provides a more thorough filtering option, with search filters that include the following:

  • By Ad Network
  • Country
  • Platform (Device)
  • Language
  • Affiliate Network
  • Tracker used
  • Keywords
  • Adult filtering


Anstrex likewise uses Advanced Boolean Searching. This means you can search ads based on a combination of attributes, may they be keywords, country, domain name, language, platform, tracker, date first or last seen, and other filter options.

Finally, it is also possible to narrow down results based on the number of days the ad has been running, the website’s Alexa rank, the ad strength, and the ad gravity.

Ad strength signifies the ad’s performance since it started running. The ad gravity, on the other hand, signifies the ad’s performance in just the recent weeks.

It is quite evident that Anstrex’s search capability is more potent than Spypush.


8. Cost Per Click History

How much have your rival companies been paying for every click to their ads? That is a vital piece of information that is hard to come by; so hard that not everyone can develop applications that will collect this data.

One of these two spy tools we’ve been comparing can. And that’s Anstrex.

Knowing how much your competitor is bidding per click, combined with the information on which ad network is being used, means you can outbid your rival and get more traffic to your offers.


9. Price

Finally, let us talk about the monthly subscription fee. Spypush is priced at only $49, while Anstrex is priced at $79.99. In this aspect, Spypush is better.

Spypush also has a 24 free trial which includes only five countries (Vietnam, Indonesia, Thailand, France, and Germany). Anstrex does not offer a free trial, but it does have a two-day money-back guarantee in case you decide to cancel after checking the platform out.


Comparison Summary

Here’s a summarized table of all the points we discussed above. At a glance, you can see which spy tool is the better choice.

Although Spypush is cheaper, we must consider the vast difference in features and benefits. Anstrex is clearly the winner in this comparison.

When subscribing to a tool, make sure it can give you the most benefits out of the rest. Anstrex may be more expensive than Spypush, but it gives more bang for your buck.

Top converting landing page sample images
Top Converting Landing Pages For Free

Receive top converting landing pages in your inbox every week from us.

Related Articles
The Measurement Problem OOH Can't Solve (And How Push and Native Advertisers Already Did)

Must Read

The Measurement Problem OOH Can't Solve (And How Push and Native Advertisers Already Did)

This article examines the fundamental measurement gap between out-of-home (OOH) advertising and performance-driven digital channels. While OOH continues to rely on probabilistic attribution models such as store visit tracking, web lift studies, and geographic correlation analysis, native and push advertising were built with measurement as a native capability. The article challenges the industry's "honest measurement" narrative, arguing that deterministic tracking, direct attribution paths, and competitive intelligence tools give native and push advertisers a structural advantage that OOH cannot replicate. It also explores why marketers continue to romanticize billboards despite these limitations and explains how prestige, visibility, and brand perception often influence media decisions more than measurable business outcomes.

Dan Smith

Dan Smith

7 minJun 11, 2026

The Tracking Gap: Why Your Competitors' Best-Performing Ads Live Outside Google Analytics

Most Read

The Tracking Gap: Why Your Competitors' Best-Performing Ads Live Outside Google Analytics

This article explores the "tracking gap" that prevents marketers from seeing the competitive strategies driving success outside their own analytics platforms. While tools like Google Analytics excel at measuring on-site behavior and campaign performance, they offer little visibility into competitors' creative testing, placement strategies, and optimization workflows across native advertising, push notifications, and other alternative traffic channels. The article distinguishes between "that" data (what happened in your campaigns) and "why" data (why competitors are succeeding), showing how dedicated ad intelligence tools can bridge the gap. It also outlines a practical competitive intelligence framework that combines internal performance data with external market signals to help marketers move beyond reactive optimization and build strategies informed by real-world competitive activity.

Rachel Thompson

Rachel Thompson

7 minJun 11, 2026

Why the Ads That Win Pencils Rarely Win Conversions — And What Performance Marketers Should Study Instead

Must Read

Why the Ads That Win Pencils Rarely Win Conversions — And What Performance Marketers Should Study Instead

This article explores the growing disconnect between award-winning advertising and performance-driven marketing. It argues that creative accolades often reward originality, artistic execution, and cultural impact, while performance marketers are judged by measurable business outcomes such as conversions, ROAS, and customer acquisition costs. The piece examines the hidden world of native, push, and pop advertising, where relentless testing and optimization consistently outperform creative prestige. It also highlights how competitive ad intelligence tools like Anstrex help marketers study proven market winners, replacing creative guesswork with data-backed insights that drive profitable campaigns.

Liam O’Connor

Liam O’Connor

7 minJun 10, 2026